Reservoir Properties and Reservoir Model of the Mu Formation in the X Oil Field of Northern Iraq

Authors

  • Peshawar Kh. M. Albarzanji Ministry of Oil, North Oil Company, Kirkuk, Iraq
  • Saad A. Mahmoud Ministry of Oil, North Oil Company, Kirkuk, Iraq
  • Hassan A. Hassan Ministry of Oil, North Oil Company, Kirkuk, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v15i1.809

Abstract

The Mu Formation is considered one of the most widespread Cretaceous periods in Iraq and its typical section is located in the province of Sulaimani in the Qamchuqa region. The study area is located in the X oil field, which is located to the southwest of the dome of Baba and southwest of the city of Kirkuk about 12 km and represents an asymmetrical subsurface fold whose axis extends in a Northwest-Southeast direction and the field is located in the unstable platform zone in the Foothill zone. The Formation consists of limestone and dolomitic limestone, organodetrital and argillaceous, the upper contact of the Formation is unconformable with the Dokan Formation, while the lower contact is graded with the Upper Sarmord Formation. The current study showed that most of the parts of the Formation contain a shale rate of less than 35%, and it was found through the logs (density, neutron and gamma rays) that the effective porosity rate is determined between (4-15) %, the rate of shale content is between (21-34) %  and the permeability rate is between (0.66-13.8) mD in a well XA, while in the XB well, the shale content rate ranges between (21-38)%, the effective porosity rate is between (8-18) %, and the permeability rate is between (1.6-18.8) mD. The Formation was divided into six reservoir units depending on the variation of shale content, porosity rate and permeability. The reservoir unit (MUE, MUC) is considered the best reservoir unit in the XA well, while the MUF unit has bad reservoir qualities in the same well. In the XB well, MUC & MUE are considered to be the best reservoir units, while MUF & MUB have less reservoir specifications compared to the previous two units. The water and hydrocarbon saturations were calculated with the movable and residual fractions of the invaded and uninvaded zones, as well as the total volume of water and oil within the Formation. After calculating the reservoir properties, the three-dimensional reservoir model was drawn by Petrel software to clarification the distribution of hydrocarbon saturation of the formation units; the net pay thickness of the Formation was calculated.

References

A. A. Aqrawi, J. C. Goff, A. D. Horbury, and F. N. Sadooni, “The Petroleum Geology of Iraq”, Scientific Press, PO Box 21, Beaconsfield, UK, 2010.

S. Z. Jassim and J. C. Goff, “Geology of Iraq”, Dolin, Prague and Moravian Museum, Brno, p. 355, 2006.

B. Al-Qayim and F. Rashid, "Reservoir characteristics of the Albian Upper Qamchuqa formation carbonates, Taq Taq oilfield, Kurdistan, Iraq", Journal of Petroleum Geology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 317-342, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.2012.00533.x

B. Al-Qayim, F. M. Qadir, and F. Albeyati, "Dolomitization and porosity evaluation of the Cretaceous Upper Qamchuqa (Mauddud) formation, Khabbaz Oilfield, Kirkuk area, northern Iraq", Geo Arabia, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 49-76, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2113/geoarabia150449

NOC, "A geological study of the Cretaceous reservoirs in Khabaz Field", Northern Oil Company, Kirkuk, Iraq, unpublished internal report, 1992.

M. Ghorab, A. M. Ramadan, and A. Z. Nouh, "The relation between the shale origin (source or non-source) and its type for Abu Roash formation at Wadi El-Natrun Area, South of Western Desert, Egypt", Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 360-371, 2008.

S. Timur, "An investigation of permeability, porosity, and residual water saturation relationship for sandstone reservoirs", The Log Analyst, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 90-123, Paper No. SPWLA-1968-vIXn4a2, 1968.

Schlumberger Limited, “Schlumberger Log Interpretation Charts”, Schlumberger Wireline and Testing, Houston, USA, 1997.

G. Asquith and C. Gibson, “Basic Well Log Analysis for Geologists: Methods in Exploration Series”, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, p. 216, 1982.

D. Tiab and E. C. Donaldson, “Petrophysics: Theory and Practice of Measuring Reservoir Rock and Fluid Transport Properties”, 2nd ed., p. 881, Elsevier, 2004.

G. E. Archie, "The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics", Trans, vol. 146, pp. 54-67, 1942. https://doi.org/10.2118/942054-G

Schlumberger Limited, “Log Interpretation”, Vol. 1. Schlumberger, 1972. ‏

G. B. Asquith, “Handbook of Log Evaluation Techniques for Carbonate Reservoirs”, AAPG, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 1985.

F. J. Lucia, C. Kerans, and J. W. Jennings Jr‏, “Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: An Integrated Approach”, J. Pet. Technol., vol. 55, pp. 70-72, 2003. https://doi.org/10.2118/82071-JPT

Downloads

Published

2025-03-21

How to Cite

(1)
Albarzanji, P. K. M. .; Mahmoud, S. A. .; Hassan, H. A. . Reservoir Properties and Reservoir Model of the Mu Formation in the X Oil Field of Northern Iraq. Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies 2025, 15, 1-17.