Subsidence and Effective Stresses Distribution Using Finite Element Techniques for an Iraqi Oilfield

Ali K.  Faraj; Ameen K.  Salih; Hassan A.  Abdul Hussein; Ali N.  Abed Al-Hasnawi

doi:10.52716/jprs.v14i4.882

Authors

Ali K. Faraj Department of Petroleum Technology, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq
Ameen K. Salih Department of Petroleum Technology, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq
Hassan A. Abdul Hussein Petroleum Research and Development Center, Ministry of Oil, Baghdad, Iraq
Ali N. Abed Al-Hasnawi Petroleum Research and Development Center, Ministry of Oil, Baghdad, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v14i4.882

Keywords:

Subsidence, Effective Stresses, Finite Element, Zubair oil field.

Abstract

Geomechanical problems are the most important problems that happen in the Zubair oil field; treating these problems requires a lot of time (Non-Productive Time) and thus increases the cost of drilling the well. Wellbore instability, subsidence, reservoir compaction, casing smash, pipe damage, and well kick is the main geomechanical problems facing the drilling process in the Mishrif formation, Zubair oilfield. The main goals of this study are to estimate the changes in stresses and subsequent subsidence values for this field during the production and injection periods. These estimation values, many problems can be avoided, thus increasing the drilling efficiency.

This study is to introduce the one way coupling between the reservoir model and geomechanical model using the finite element method. The finite element technique in CMG 2018 program was used to estimate the stress states during the production or injection operations in this field of interest.

The results of the 3D finite element model showed that the effective vertical stress rises by 32 psi during production while the effective horizontal stress increases by 16 psi. This may be explained by the fact that variations in pore pressure have little or no impact on the total vertical stress generated by weight. The results of this study demonstrated that the finite element method is a conservative method for coupling reservoir geomechanics and fluid flow. Subsidence values were 6.096 mm in the north part of the Al-Hammar dome, while at the center the subsidence was -5.1816 mm. Shuaiba dome has negative subsidence which is about -9.75 mm. It is important to note that the positive results subsidence signify the pore volume compacting, which may have an impact on the permeability and porosity of the reservoir petrophysics. As a result of a negative subsidence deformation, different failures including well casing damage, wellbore failure, and pipe smashing, are expected. Based on these results, production can cause an increase in the differential stress, which leads to rock shear failure and in injection cases, increasing pore pressure can cause a tensile rock failure.

References

J. Whaley, "An Introduction to Geomechanics", GEO ExPro Journal, 2019.

J. Wang, and X. Ye, “A weak Galerkin finite element method for second-order elliptic problems", Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 241, pp.103-115, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2012.10.003

F. Pan, K. Sepehrnoori, and L. Chin, "November. Development of a coupled geomechanics model for a parallel compositional reservoir simulator," In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, One Petro, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2118/109867-MS

A. K. Faraj, A. K. Salih, H. A. Abdul Hussein, and A. N. Abed Al-Hasnawi, “Variation of total stresses during field operation using finite element technique, Zubair oil field,” Iraqi Journal of Oil and Gas Research (IJOGR), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 25–42, 2023. https://doi.org/10.55699/ijogr.2023.0301.1036

A. Vedernikova, M. Parrillo, S. Akel, and D. Mardanov, "January. Overcoming Challenges in the West Qurna-2 Drilling Campaign", In SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, One Petro, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2118/178198-MS

A. K. Faraj, H. A. Abdul Hussein, and G. H. Jani,"Estimation of Static Young Modulus for the Third section in Zubair Oil Field: A Comparison Study", Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp.16-31, 2023. https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v13i2.693

J. S. Bell, "Practical methods for estimating in situ stresses for borehole stability applications in sedimentary basins", Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol.38, no. (3-4), pp. 111-119, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(03)00025-1

D. Y. Ding, "Coupled simulation of near-wellbore and reservoir models", Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 76, no. (1-2), pp. 21-36, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.12.004

J. Zhang, "Pore pressure prediction from well logs: Methods, modifications, and new approaches”, Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 108, no. (1-2), pp. 50-63, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.06.001.

B. J. Mac Donald, "Practical stress analysis with finite elements", Glasnevin publishing, Ireland, 2007.

W. E. Pratt, and D. W. Johnson, “Local subsidence of the Goose Creek oil field”, The Journal of Geology, vol. 34, no. 7, part 1, pp. 577-590, 1926.

D. Kosloff, R. F. Scott, and J. Scranton, "Finite element simulation of Wilmington oil field subsidence: I. Linear modelling", Tectonophysics, vol. 65, no. 3-4, pp. 339-368, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(80)90082-7

D. R. Allen, “Physical changes of reservoir properties caused by subsidence and repressuring operations”, Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 20, no. 01, pp. 23-29, 1968. https://doi.org/10.2118/1811-PA

R. F. Yerkes, and R. O. Castle, "Surface deformation associated with oil and gas field operations in the United States”, Land subsidence: proceedings of the Tokyo Symposium, vol. 1, pp. 55-56, 1970.

H. A. Merle, C. J. Kentie, G. Van Opstal, and G. M. Schneider, "Bachaquero study: a composite analysis of the behavior of a compaction drive/solution-gas drive reservoir”, (No. CONF-750924-), Shell Internat. Petr. Mij. BV, 1975.

J. B. Schoonbeek, "April. Land subsidence as a result of natural gas extraction in the province of Groningen", In SPE European Spring Meeting, One Petro, 1976. https://doi.org/10.2118/5751-MS

T. Okumura, "Analysis of land subsidence n Nîgata", Proc. 1st Int. Symp. on Land Subsidence, Publication 88 and 89 of the Int. Assoc. of Hydrologic Science and UNESCO, Vol. I, p. 130, 1969.

R. W. Lewis, and Y. Sukirman, "Finite element modelling for simulating the surface subsidence above a compacting hydrocarbon reservoir", International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 619-639, 1994.doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610180904

M. J. Mes, "Ekofisk Reservoir Voidage and Seabed Subsidence", Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 42, vol. 11, pp. 1434-1438, 1990. https://doi.org/10.2118/19821-PA

A. K. Faraj, H. Abdul Hussein, and A. Abed Al-Hasnawi, “Estimation of internal friction angle for the third section in Zubair Oil Field: A comparison study,” Iraqi Journal of Oil and Gas Research (IJOGR), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 102–111, 2022. https://doi.org/10.55699/ijogr.2022.0202.1031

M. Mohajjel, and C. L. Fergusson, "Dextral transpression in Late Cretaceous continental collision, Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone, western Iran", Journal of Structural Geology, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1125-1139, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(00)00023-7

T. Buday, S. Z. Jassim, "The regional geology of Iraq, tectonism, magmatism, and metamorphism", GEOSURV, Baghdad, Iraq,1987.

H. S. Almalikee, and S. Sen. "Present-day in situ pore pressure distribution in the tertiary and cretaceous sediments of Zubair oil field, Iraq", Asian J. Earth Sci., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajes.2020.1.11

T. K. Al-Ameri, M. S. A. Jafar, and J. Pitman, "Modeling Hydrocarbon Generations of the Basrah Oil Fields, Southern Iraq”, Based on Petromod with Palynofacies Evidence, AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, pp. 10-13, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.287.1176781

D. L. Logan, “A first course in the finite element method”, vol. 4. Thomson, 2011.

S. W. Sloan, and A. J. Abbo, "Biot consolidation analysis with automatic time stepping and error control Part 1: theory and implementation", International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, vol. 23, no. 9 pp. 467-492, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199905)23:6%3C467::AID-NAG949%3E3.0.CO;2-R

K. Terzaghi, R. B. Peck, and G. Mesri, "Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice (2n edn)", John wiley & sons, New York, 1967.

P. B. Bochev, and M. D. Gunzburger, "Least-squares finite element methods", Springer Science & Business Media, vol. 166, 2009.

J. Bramble, R. Lazarov, and J. Pasciak, “A least-squares approach based on a discrete minus one inner product for first order systems”, Mathematics of Computation, vol. 66, no. 219, pp. 935-955, 1997.

Z. Cai, X. Ye, and H. Zhang, "Least‐squares finite element approximations for the Reissner‐Mindlin plate", Numerical linear algebra with applications, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 479-496, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1506(199909)6:6<479::AID-NLA172>3.0.CO;2-K

P. B. Bochev, and M. D. Gunzburger, "Accuracy of least-squares methods for the Navier-Stokes equations", Computers & fluids, vol. 22, no. 4-5, pp. 549-563, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7930(93)90025-5

L. Mu, J. Wang, and X. Ye, "A least-squares-based weak Galerkin finite element method for second order elliptic equations", SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. A1531-A1557, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1083244

D. J. Reddish, and B. N. Whittaker, "Subsidence: occurrence, prediction and control", Elsevier, 2012.

G. Gambolati, G. Ricceri, W. Bertoni, G. Brighenti, and E. Vuillermin, "Mathematical simulation of the subsidence of Ravenna", Water Resources Research, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 2899-2918, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR01567

R. Hillis, "Pore pressure/stress coupling and its implications for seismicity", Exploration Geophysics, vol. 31, no. 1-2, pp. 448-454, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1071/EG00448