Manganese-Based Bifunctional as an Oil–Soluble Homogenous Catalyst for in–Situ Catalytic Upgrading of High Sulfur Heavy Crude Oil

Authors

  • Omar F. AL-Mishaal Iraqi Ministry of Education
  • Atta O. Hussein North Refineries Company
  • Taha A. Issa North Refineries Company

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v15i4.972

Keywords:

Heavy crude oil, Catalytic upgrading heavy oil, Catalytic aquathermolysis, Oil-soluble catalyst, In-situ catalytic upgrading

Abstract

Manganese naphthenate (C₂₂H₁₄MnO₄), a black oil-soluble liquid, was used for the first time as a bifunctional homogeneous catalyst in heavy oil upgrading under steam conditions. The catalyst combines two key functions: cracking, due to the 6% manganese content, and hydrogen donation from the naphthenate component, which enhances hydrogenation reactions, increases the H/C ratio, and facilitates hydrodesulfurization. Experiments were conducted in an autoclave reactor using heavy oil with high sulfur content under three temperatures (200, 250, and 300 °C) for 24 hours, in the presence and absence of the catalyst. The study employed several analytical techniques—viscosity measurement, SARA analysis, gas chromatography (GC), and X-ray diffraction (XRD)—to evaluate catalyst performance. Gas analysis by GC showed that, without the catalyst, the total light hydrocarbon gases (ΣC₁–C₄) and H₂S reached 0.8150 wt% and 1.2960 wt%, respectively, while with the catalyst, these increased to 1.4905 wt% and 1.5400 wt%. This indicates enhanced cracking and desulfurization activity. Viscosity measurements using a Brookfield Viscometer revealed that at 300 °C, the catalyst reduced the oil viscosity from 2802 mPa·s to 1437 mPa·s, achieving a 51% reduction, compared to only 29% (to 1962 mPa·s) without the catalyst. SARA analysis showed that the light fractions (saturates + aromatics) increased from 72% in the original oil to 80.76% with the catalyst and 75.69% without it, confirming significant cracking and hydrogenation. The presence of MnS in the solid residues after reaction further supports the catalyst’s participation in hydrodesulfurization.

Overall, manganese naphthenate demonstrated excellent catalytic activity in upgrading heavy oil through combined cracking, hydrogenation, and desulfurization mechanisms under steam conditions, making it a promising candidate for improving the quality and flow properties of high-sulfur heavy crude oils.

References

H. K. Abdel-Aal, M. A. Aggour, and M. A. Fahim, “Petroleum and gas field processing”, (1st ed.), CRC press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429258497.

J. J. Conti, P. D. Holtberg, J. A. Beamon, A. M. Schaal, J. C. Ayoub, and J. T. Turnure, “Annual energy outlook 2014”, US Energy Information Administration, vol. 2, 2014.

L. C. Castaneda, J. A. D. Munoz, and J. Ancheyta, “Current situation of emerging technologies for upgrading of heavy oils”, Catalysis Today, vol. 220-222, pp. 248–273, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.05.016.

A. E. Outlook, “With Projections to 2050 (US Energy Information Administration, 2017),” Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. https://www. eia. gov/outlooks/aeo, 2017.

K. Guo, H. Li, and Z. Yu, “In-situ heavy and extra-heavy oil recovery: A review”, Fuel, vol. 185, pp. 886–902, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.047.

D. Vartivarian and H. Andrawis, “Elayed coking schemes are most economical for heavy-oil upgrading”, Oil & gas journal, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 52–56, 2006.

E. Furimsky, “Catalysts for upgrading heavy petroleum feeds”, Elsevier, 2007.

G. M. Dhar, G. M. Kumaran, M. Kumar, K. S. Rawat, L. D. Sharma, B. D. Raju, and K. S. R. Rao, “Physico-chemical characterization and catalysis on SBA-15 supported molybdenum hydrotreating catalysts”, Catalysis Today, vol. 99, no. 3–4, pp. 309–314, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2004.10.005.

T. N. Pham, D. Shi, and D. E. Resasco, “Evaluating strategies for catalytic upgrading of pyrolysis oil in liquid phase”, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 145, pp. 10–23, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.01.002.

J. Alfadhli, A. Alhindi, A. Alotaibi, and D. Bahzad, “Performance assessment of NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalysts for upgrading KEC-AR: An assessment of selected apparent kinetic parameters of selected hydrotreating reactions”, Fuel, vol. 164, pp. 38–45, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.09.079.

A. Al-Marshed, A. Hart, G. Leeke, M. Greaves, and J. Wood, “Effectiveness of different transition metal dispersed catalysts for in situ heavy oil upgrading”, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 54, no. 43, pp. 10645–10655, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02953.

A. Al-Marshed, A. Hart, G. Leeke, M. Greaves, and J. Wood, “Optimization of heavy oil upgrading using dispersed nanoparticulate iron oxide as a catalyst”, Energy & Fuels, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 6306–6316, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01451.

A. Yusuf, R. S. Al-Hajri, Y. M. Al-Waheibi, and B. Y. Jibril, “In-situ upgrading of Omani heavy oil with catalyst and hydrogen donor”, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, vol. 121, pp. 102–112, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2016.07.010.

A. Hart, J. Wood, and M. Greaves, “In situ catalytic upgrading of heavy oil using a pelletized Ni-Mo/Al2O3 catalyst in the THAI process”, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 156, pp. 958–965, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.067.

C. Yuan, D. A. Emelianov, M. A. Varfolomeev, N. O. Rodionov, M. A. Suwaid, and I. R. Vakhitov, “Mechanistic and kinetic insight into catalytic oxidation process of heavy oil in in-situ combustion process using copper (Ⅱ) stearate as oil soluble catalyst”, Fuel, vol. 284, p. 118981, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118981.

F. Zhao, Y. Liu, Z. Fu, and X. Zhao, “Using hydrogen donor with oil-soluble catalysts for upgrading heavy oil”, Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry, vol. 87, no. 10, pp. 1498–1506, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427214100164.

L. A. Rankel, “Hydrocracking vacuum resid with Ni W bifunctional slurry catalysts”, Fuel processing technology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 185–202, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3820(94)90015-9.

H. Luo, W. Deng, J. Gao, W. Fan, and G. Que, “Dispersion of water-soluble catalyst and its influence on the slurry-phase hydrocracking of residue”, Energy & Fuels, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1161–1167, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef1014378.

J. Cui, Z. Zhang, X. Liu, L. Liu, and J. Peng, “Analysis of the viscosity reduction of crude oil with nano-Ni catalyst by acoustic cavitation”, Fuel, vol. 275, p. 117976, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117976.

M. Alaei, M. Bazmi, A. Rashidi, and A. Rahimi, “Heavy crude oil upgrading using homogenous nanocatalyst”, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 158, pp. 47–55, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.08.031.

F. A. Aliev et al., “In-situ heavy oil aquathermolysis in the presence of nanodispersed catalysts based on transition metals”, Processes, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9010127.

M. A. Coronel-García, A. I. R. de la Torre, J. M. Domínguez-Esquivel, J. A. Melo-Banda, and A. L. Martínez-Salazar, “Heavy oil hydrocracking kinetics with nano-nickel dispersed in PEG300 as slurry phase catalyst using batch reactor”, Fuel, vol. 283, p. 118930, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118930.

J. Ancheyta, “Modeling of processes and reactors for upgrading of heavy petroleum”, CRC Press, 2013.

“Specification sheet.,” Schmierungstechnik, vol. 19, no. 2, 1988, pp. 61–63, 1988.

X. D. Tang, X. D. Chen, J. J. Li, L. Y. Deng, and G. J. Liang, “Experimental study on homogeneous catalytic upgrading of heavy oil”, Petroleum Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 1018–1023, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544117120143.

K. Chao, Y. Chen, H. Liu, X. Zhang, and J. Li, “Laboratory experiments and field test of a difunctional catalyst for catalytic aquathermolysis of heavy oil”, Energy & Fuels, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1152–1159, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef2018385

C. W. Brown, P. F. Lynch, and M. Ahmadjian, “Applications of infrared spectroscopy in petroleum analysis and oil spill identification”, Applied Spectroscopy Reviews, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 223–248, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1080/05704927508081491.

A. A. Al-Muntaser, M. A. Varfolomeev, M. A. Suwaid, D. A. Feoktistov, C. Yuan, A. E. Klimovitskii, B. I. Gareev, R. Djimasbe, D. K. Nurgaliev, S. I. Kudryashov, E. V. Egorova, A. V. Fomkin, O. V. Petrashov, I. S. Afanasiev, and G. D. Fedorchenko, “Hydrogen donating capacity of water in catalytic and non-catalytic aquathermolysis of extra-heavy oil: Deuterium tracing study”, Fuel, vol. 283, p. 118957, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118957.

T. Sato, S. Mori, M. Watanabe, M. Sasaki, and N. Itoh, “Upgrading of bitumen with formic acid in supercritical water”, The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 232–240, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2010.07.010.

P. R. Kapadia, M. S. Kallos, and I. D. Gates, “A new reaction model for aquathermolysis of Athabasca bitumen”, The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 475–482, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.21662.

S. K. Maity, J. Ancheyta, and G. Marroquín, “Catalytic aquathermolysis used for viscosity reduction of heavy crude oils: a review”, Energy & Fuels, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 2809–2816, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef100230k.

J. Li, Y. Chen, H. Liu, P. Wang, and F. Liu, “Influences on the aquathermolysis of heavy oil catalyzed by two different catalytic ions: Cu2+ and Fe3+”, Energy & fuels, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 2555–2562, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef400328s.

H. Jia, P.-G. Liu, W.-F. Pu, X.-P. Ma, J. Zhang, and L. Gan, “In situ catalytic upgrading of heavy crude oil through low-temperature oxidation”, Petroleum Science, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 476–488, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-016-0113-6.

J. Wang, T. Wang, X. Hou, and F. Xiao, “Modelling of rheological and chemical properties of asphalt binder considering SARA fraction”, Fuel, vol. 238, pp. 320–330, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.126.

Y. L. Chen, P. Li, Y. Q. Wang, and J. He, “Change of carbazole compounds in heavy oil by catalytic aquathermolysis and the catalytic mechanism of viscosity reduction”, Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 271–277, 2011.

A. V. Vakhin, S. A. Sitnov, I. I. Mukhamatdinov, F. A. Aliev, S. I. Kudryashov, I. S. Afanasiev, O. V. Petrashov, M. A. Varfolomeev, and D. K. Nurgaliev, “Aquathermolysis of heavy oil in reservoir conditions with the use of oil-soluble catalysts: part III–changes in composition resins and asphaltenes”, Petroleum Science and Technology, vol. 36, no. 22, pp. 1857–1863, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2018.1514413.

W. L. Qin and Z. L. Xiao, “The researches on upgrading of heavy crude oil by catalytic aquathermolysis treatment using a new oil-soluble catalyst”, in Advanced Materials Research, Trans Tech Publ, 2013, pp. 1428–1432. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.608-609.1428.

J. B. Hyne, P. D. Clark, R. A. Clarke, J. Koo, and J. W. Greidanus, “Aquathermolysis of heavy oils”, Rev. Tec. INTEVEP;(Venezuela), vol. 2, no. 2, 1982.

Y. Wang, Y. Chen, J. He, P. Li, and C. Yang, “Mechanism of catalytic aquathermolysis: Influences on heavy oil by two types of efficient catalytic ions: Fe3+ and Mo6+”, Energy & fuels, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1502–1510, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901339k.

A. A. Saraev et al., “XAS study of Mo-based dispersed catalysts for upgrading of heavy oil”, Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 175, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.05.025.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-21

How to Cite

(1)
AL-Mishaal, O. F.; Hussein, A. O. .; Issa, T. A. Manganese-Based Bifunctional As an Oil–Soluble Homogenous Catalyst for in–Situ Catalytic Upgrading of High Sulfur Heavy Crude Oil. Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies 2025, 15, 127-143.