Risk Management in The Oil Sector / Oil Exploration Company as A Case Study

Authors

  • Noor A. Abdul Jabbar Civil Engineering Department, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Hatem K. Breesam Civil Engineering Department, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v13i3.686

Keywords:

Operational risks, financial and administrative risks, economic and political risks, potential risks, Fuzzy Logic, Analytical Network Process, Alternative, Solutions.

Abstract

This paper aims to propose a decision tool that helps estimate the risk probability in the petroleum sector in Iraq, which has many benefits for identifying the most important factor. This model was developed by using the relative importance index (RII) method incorporated into fuzzy Logic. An extensive literature review was conducted, and a questionnaire was distributed to the private and government sectors to scan all possible risks in the petroleum sector. As a result, forty–eight risks in the petroleum sector were identified and categorized into four groups: operational risks, financial and administrative risks, economic and political risks, and potential risks. Over 170 questionnaire forms have been distributed to engineers, managers, experts, and technicians, and 153 forms have been adopted for the analysis. The SPSS software was used to execute the statistical analysis concerning statical mean and relative important index. Also, the questionnaire results were analyzed using the relative importance index. The ranking of the groups and factors was demonstrated according to their level of effect on risk. Finally, a fuzzy assessment model was constructed and tested being appropriate to identify the probability of risk in the Iraqi petroleum sector to assess and estimate risk. Oil exploration company, one of the associations of the ministry of oil in Iraq, has been taken as a case study of this research to determine the risks and validate the model. This paper will seek the best solution to eliminate or minimized risks in the Iraqi patrolmen sector, especially at the Iraq oil exploration company as it has been taken as a case study. Three types of risk solutions were tested and optimized and those solutions are the avoid, the mitigate, and the transfer of the risks. The ANP mothed was used to determine the priority or the effectiveness of each type of solution to find the best alternative option for each risk factor. The result shows that the best way to deal with oil and gas risks in the Iraq petroleum sector is to avoid these risks. Because the solutions belonging to this group have an effective value of 65.4 %. The other two groups of mitigation and transfer have less effectiveness of 19.8 % and 14.8 % respectively. Moreover, the local and global priorities of the most important risk factor are also determined to validate and optimized the result. Finally, a list of alternative solutions recommended by the experts has been illustrated. 

References

A. M. Burhan, “Risk management in construction projects”, MSc thesis, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq, 2003.

L. A. Herkenhoff, “Profile of the Oil and Gas Industry: resources, market forces, Geopolitics, and Technology”, New York, United States of America: Business Expert Press Industry Profiles Collection, 2014.

K. Schwab, "The global competitiveness report 2018", World Economic Forum, Vol. 671, 2018.

K. Schwab, “The Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017”, World Economic Forum, September 2016. available at www.weforum.org/gcr

BP Energy Outlook, available at: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/energy-outlook/bp-energy-outlook-2016.pdf

H. Devold, “Oil and gas production handbook: an introduction to oil and gas production”, Lulu. Com, 2013.

K. A. Suda, N. S. A. Rani, H. A. Rahman, & W. Chen, “A review on risks and project risks management: oil and gas industry”, International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 938-943, 2015.

R. M. Razalli, “The Malaysian oil and gas industry: an overview”, Jurutera, the Institution of Engineers, Malaysia, 1, pp. 8-12, 2005.

J. F. F. Barata, O. L. G. Quelhas, H. G. Costa, R. H. Gutierrez, V. de Jesus Lameira, and M. J. Meiriño, “Multi-criteria indicator for sustainability rating in suppliers of the oil and gas industries in Brazil”, Sustainability, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1107-1128, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6031107

M. Sánchez, F. Prats, N. Agell, and G. Ormazabal, “Multiple-criteria evaluation for value management”, Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 131-137, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2005)21:3(131)

T. F. Liang, “Project management decisions using fuzzy linear programming”, International journal of systems science, vol. 37, no. 15, pp. 1141-1152, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207720601014396

E. Plebankiewicz, “Contractor prequalification model using fuzzy sets”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 377-385, 2009. https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.377-385

J. R. San Cristobal, “Critical path definition using multicriteria decision making: PROMETHEE method”, Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 158-163, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000135

M. F. Hasan, and M. S. Mohammed, “Time Overrun Model for Construction Projects in Iraq by Using Fuzzy Logic”, Vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 2593–2607, Article ID: IJCIET_09_11_262, 2018.

Z. S. M. Khaled, R. S. A. Ali, and M. F. Hassan, “Predicting the Delivery Time of Public School Building Projects Using Nonlinear Regression”, Engineering and Technology Journal, vol. 34, no. 8 Part (A), pp. 1538-1548, 2016. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.34.8A.6

L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy set”, Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338-353, 1965. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

A. S. Tofan, and H. K. Breesam, “Using the Fuzzy-AHP technique for determining the key performance indicators of public construction companies in Iraq”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, vol. 9, no. 13, pp. 1431-1445, 2018.

J. Zeng, M. An, and N. J. Smith, “Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment”, International journal of project management, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 589-600, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.02.006

J. Shao, M. Taisch, M. A. Ortega Mier, and E. D'Avolio, “Application of the DEMATEL Method to Identi-fy Relations among Barriers between Green Products and Consumers”, 17th European Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production - ERSCP 2014, pp. 1029–1040, 2014.

Jihan M. S. Daoud, A thesis submitted to the College of Engineering of the Uni-versity of Baghdad – Iraq Alternative of Affordable Residential Complexes to Solve Slums Areas in Baghdad, 2019.

Meervat R. Wali, A thesis submitted to the College of Engineering of the University of Baghdad – Iraq Optimal Selection of Investment and Traditional Contracts For Infrastruc-ture Projects in Iraq, 2015.

S. Jharkhariaa, and R. Shankarb, “Selection of logistics service provider”: An analytic net-work process (ANP) approach, Vol. 35, no. 3, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.06.005

Downloads

Published

2023-09-10

How to Cite

(1)
Abdul Jabbar, N. A. .; Breesam, H. K. . Risk Management in The Oil Sector / Oil Exploration Company As A Case Study. Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies 2023, 13, 183-201.