Sulfur Removal in Gasoil Feedstocks by Hydrotreating Process: A Comparative Study

Authors

  • Sattar Jalil Hussein Petroleum Research & Development Center, Iraqi Ministry of Oil, Baghdad, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v14i4.819

Abstract

This study focuses on the hydrodesulfurization process of two different types of feedstocks: low and high-sulfur-content gasoil. The objective is to remove sulfur using a commercial Co-Mo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst obtained from the Daura refinery. The catalyst underwent various characterization tests, including BET surface area, crush strength, and composition tests using atomic absorption. Similarly, the feedstocks were also characterized before the evaluation process. The study explored the impact of temperature, LHSV (Liquid Hourly Space Velocity), and pressure as operating conditions for gasoil hydrodesulfurization (HDS) using the commercial catalyst Co-Mo/γ-Al2O3 in a pilot hydrotreating unit located at the petroleum research & development centre. The findings indicated that decreasing LHSV led to an increase in sulfur removal. Furthermore, increasing the temperature showed a general trend of increased sulfur removal for both high and low sulfur gasoil feedstocks. These trends were observed within the optimal operating conditions of LHSV 1 hr-1, 375oC temperature, 35 bar pressure, and a ratio of 200 cm3 of hydrogen gas to 200 cm3 of hydrocarbon. These results shed new light on the potential of this catalyst for effectively treating heavier fuels containing complex sulfur compounds.

References

References:

E. E. A., "Optimization petroleum refining and the production of ulsg and ulsd, Bethesda, Maryland", mathproinc, pp. 35, 2011.

R. A. Meyers, "Handbook of petroleum refining processes", McGraw-Hill Education, 3rd edition (October 14, 2003).

A. Srivastav and V. C. Srivastava, “Adsorptive desulfurization by activated alumina”, J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 170, no. 2–3, pp. 1133–1140, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.088

S. Mustapha, M. M. Ndamitso, A. S. Abdulkareem, J. O. Tijani, A. K. Mohammed, and D. T. Shuaib, “Potential of using kaolin as a natural adsorbent for the removal of pollutants from tannery wastewater”, Heliyon, vol. 5, no. 11, p. e02923, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02923

E. Naranov, O. Golubev, K. Zanaveskin, A. Guseva, P. Nikulshin, Y. Kolyagin, A. Maximov, and E. Karakhanov, “Ni-Based Nanoparticles on Mesoporous Silica Supports for Single-Stage Arsenic and Chlorine Removal during Diesel Fraction Hydrotreating”, ACS Omega, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 6611–6618, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b04373

K. AlKhafaji, Z. Shakor, B. Al-Zaidi, and S. Hussein, “Gasoil Hydro-desulfurization using Catalyst synthesized from Iraqi Kaolin Clay: Optimization with Response Surface Methodology (RSM)”, Eng. Technol. J., vol. 39, no. 5A, pp. 836–845, 2021. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.v39i5A.1977

N. S. Ahmed zeki, S. J. Hussein, K. K. Aoyed, S. K. Ibrahim, and I. K. Mehawee, “Synthesis and Characterization of Co-Mo/γ-Alumina Catalyst from local Kaolin clay for Hydrodesulfurization of Iraqi Naphtha,” J. Pet. Res. Stud., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 84–106, 2021. https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v11i1.431

X. Li, X. Wang, J. Ning, H. Wei, L. Hao, " Novel Impregnation–Deposition Method to Synthesize a Presulfided MoS2/Al2O3 Catalyst and Its Application in Hydrodesulfurization", ACS Omega, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 2596-2606, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c07123

S. Rangarajan and M. Mavrikakis, “On the Preferred Active Sites of Promoted MoS2 for Hydrodesulfurization with Minimal Organonitrogen Inhibition”, ACS Catal., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 501–509, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b02735

N. Arul Dhas, A. Ekhtiarzadeh, and K. S. Suslick, “Sonochemical preparation of supported hydrodesulfurization catalysts”, Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 123, no. 34, pp. 8310–8316, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja010516y

H. Q. Hussein, S. M. Ali, B. A. A. Altabbakh, S. J. Hussein, Y. M. Ali, and S. karim Ibrahim, "Hydrodesulfurization and Hydrodearomatization of Kerosene over high metal loading Ni w/γ-Al2O3 Catalyst", Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 28-46, Jul. 2021. https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v8i4.261

T. Kabe, W. Qian, S. Ogawa, and A. Ishihara, "Mechanism of hydrodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene on Co-Mo/Al2O3 and Co/Al2O3 catalyst by the use of radioisotope 35S tracer", Journal of Catalysis, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 239-248, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1993.1269

K. H. Choi, N. Kunisada, Y. Korai, I. Mochida, and K. Nakano, “Facile ultra-deep desulfurization of gas oil through two-stage or -layer catalyst bed”, Catal. Today, vol. 86, no. 1–4, pp. 277–286, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(03)00413-9

M. Mapiour, V. Sundaramurthy, A. K. Dalai, and J. Adjaye, “Effects of the operating variables on hydrotreating of heavy gas oil: Experimental, modeling, and kinetic studies”, Fuel, vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 2536–2543, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.02.024

S. A. Hosseini, M. Akbari, and J. Nikbakht, “Adsorptive desulfurization of oil derivatives using nanostructured Mg-Al layered double hydroxides: Experimental design and modeling”, Iranian Journal of Catalysis, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 2018.

Sing, K. S. W.. "Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984)" Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 603-619, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198557040603

B. Xu, T. Xiao, Z. Yan, X. Sun, J. Sloan, S. L. González-Cortés, F. Alshahrani, and M. L. H. Green, “Synthesis of mesoporous alumina with highly thermal stability using glucose template in aqueous system”, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., vol. 91, no. 1–3, pp. 293–295, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.12.007

A. H. A. K. Mohammed, H. K. Hussain, and T. M. Naife, “Hydrodesulfurization of Iraqi Atmospheric Gasoil by Ti-Ni-Mo/γ-Al2O3 Prepared Catalyst”, Journal of Engineering, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 13–24, 2017. https://doi: 10.31026/j.eng.2017.11.02.

S. H. Ammar, "The effect of mass transfer resistance on the kinetics of catalytic hydrodesulfurization of thiophene over Pt/Al2O3", Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 89-97, Feb. 2011. https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v2i1.35.

K. Ghanbari, M. Mohammadi, and M. Tajerian, “The Effect of mass transfer resistance on the kinetics of Thiophene Desulfurization”, Petroleum & Coal, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 33–36, 2006.

A. W. A. Al-ajeel and S. I. Al-sindy, “Alumina Recovery From Iraqi Kaolinitic Clay By Hydrochloric Acid Route”, Iraqi Bulletin of Geology and Mining, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2006.

H. Silla, "Chemical process engineering design and economics", 1st Edition, CRC Press, p. 504, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203912454

P. Steiner and E. A. Blekkan, “Catalytic hydrodesulfurization of a light gas oil over a NiMo catalyst: Kinetics of selected sulfur components”, Fuel Process. Technol., vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(02)00016-4

T. C. Ho and G. E. Markley, “Property-reactivity correlation for hydrodesulfurization of prehydrotreated distillates”, Appl. Catal. A Gen., vol. 267, no. 1–2, pp. 245–250, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2004.03.009

T. C. Ho, “Hydroprocessing catalysis on metal sulfides prepared from molecular complexes”, Catal. Today, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 206–220, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2007.06.076

S. T. Hussain, F. Zia, and M. Mazhar, “Modified nano supported catalyst for selective catalytic hydrogenation of edible oils”, Eur. Food Res. Technol., vol. 228, no. 5, pp. 799–806, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-008-0991-y

D. Bose, "Design Parameters for a Hydro desulfurization (HDS) Unit for Petroleum Naphtha at 3500 Barrels per Day", World Scientific News, vol. 9, pp. 88-100, 2015.

K. S. AlKhafaji, B. Y. Al-Zaidi, Z. M. Shakor, and S. J. Hussein, “Comparison between Conventional and Metakaolin bi-functional Catalyst in the Hydrodesulfurization Operation”, Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 64-80, Jun. 2022. https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v12i2.658

H. Qabazard, F. Abu-Seedo, A. Stanislaus, M. Andari, and M. Absi-Halabi, "Comparison between the performance of conventional and high-metal co-mo and ni-mo catalysts in deep desulfurization of kuwait atmospheric gas oil", Fuel science & technology international, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1135-1151, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1080/08843759508947728

C. Lin, H. Wang, Z. Li, B. Wang, X. Ma, S. Qin, and Q. Sun, “Effect of a promoter on the methanation activity of a Mo-based sulfur-resistant catalyst”, Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 88–94, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-013-1301-1

M. Kumar, F. Aberuagba, J. K. Gupta, K. S. Rawat, L. D. Sharma, and G. M. Dhar, “Temperature-programmed reduction and acidic properties of molybdenum supported on MgO-Al2O3 and their correlation with catalytic activity”, Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 213, no. 2, pp. 217–223, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2003.12.005

A. Borgna, E. J. M. Hensen, J. A. R. Van Veen, and J. W. Niemantsverdriet, "Intrinsic kinetics of thiophene HDS over a NiMo/SiO2 model catalyst", Preprints of Symposia-American Chemical Society, Division of Fuel Chemistry, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 60, 2003.

D. Laurenti, B. Phung-Ngoc, C. Roukoss, E. Devers, K. Marchand, L. Massin, L. Lemaitre, C. Legens A. Quoineaud, and M. Vrinat, “Intrinsic potential of alumina-supported CoMo catalysts in HDS: Comparison between γc, γt, and δ-alumina”, Journal of Catalysis, vol. 297, pp. 165–175, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2012.10.006

M. I. Mohammed, A. A. Abdul Razak, and M. A. Shehab, “Synthesis of Nanocatalyst for Hydrodesulfurization of Gasoil Using Laboratory Hydrothermal Rig”, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1381–1387, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2249-5

Downloads

Published

2024-12-22

How to Cite

(1)
Hussein, S. J. . Sulfur Removal in Gasoil Feedstocks by Hydrotreating Process: A Comparative Study . Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies 2024, 14, 94-110.

Most read articles by the same author(s)